- From: Giovanni Michetti <giovanni.michetti@ubc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:30:57 +0200
- To: Jane Stevenson <Jane.Stevenson@jisc.ac.uk>
- CC: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org>
In my opinion, choosing an adequate name is a desirable requirement. Choosing a definition that is not open to misinterpration is a mandatory requirement :-) Giovanni Il 11/04/2017 18:18, Jane Stevenson ha scritto: > [...] Personally, I accept Richard’s argument that the name isn’t so important in principle, but I think in practice its best to give it a name and definition that is less open to mis-interpretation. > > regards, > Jane.
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2017 16:29:19 UTC