On 2008-01-25 13:50:45 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > We already got rid of the comma the first time someone spotted > the issue. What makes you think this was not resolved? The formal grammar when I last read the spec. > Having said that, you already re-raised this resolved (I think) > issue in your e-mail I still have to reply to. Please don't > create so much overhead :-) Just be a bit more explicit about the baseline you're looking at when you say "don't want to change." That helps to avoid overhead for all of us. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 14:05:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 January 2008 14:05:21 GMT