W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008

Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:44:26 +0100
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t5fmwc0164w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:12:06 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Another (probably better, based upon experience with caching) approach
>> would be to use a delta rather than a http-date.
>
> Yeah, I agree that having the header just have a number of seconds would
> be better than having an HTTP date.

Ok. Is naming it Method-Check-Expires still acceptable in that case? Also,  
what is the best BNF syntax to use here?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:40:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:40:59 GMT