- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:24:09 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Dave, Anne, All, On Jan 19, 2008, at 1:36 PM, ext David Orchard wrote: > The Working Group has not talked about or agreed to integrating the > requirements and use cases into the access control spec. In fact, we > had a discussion last week about going to Note on document. I don't > mind not editing the requirements document if that's bothering you, Dave is correct - on Jan 16 we agreed to put the UCs, requirements, etc. in a WG Note. Again, I think the highest priority is to document this information and I remain mostly indifferent as to whether this documentation is captured in a non-normative part of the spec or a separate WG Note. However, since Dave is agreeable to not continuing to edit the requirements document my recommendation is to just use the spec. > but I'd like these changes to be backed out because they do not > have any WG > consensus. As Anne mentioned in his reply to this thread [1], our working mode is for the Editor to capture inputs, discussions, etc. in an Editor's Draft (ED) and for the other WG members to submit comments against the ED. In this case, we know Jonas supports the addition of these requirements and I also voiced my support for adding them [2]. Thus I view Anne's action as being consistent with our current working model. Regards, Art Barstow [1] <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.t46xbhmm64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com> [2] <http://www.w3.org/mid/506BCFA4-B426-462E-92F3- EED3A2D59683@nokia.com> > > Thanks, > Dave > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-appformats-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-appformats-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anne >> van Kesteren >> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:32 AM >> To: WAF WG (public) >> Subject: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ >> >> >> Hi, >> >> To help keep us on track I took the feedback we had on use >> cases and requirements so far and integrated them into the >> main specification as proposal. I have also integrated the >> design decision FAQ I created because several people >> indicated it was a useful document. >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#requirements >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#use-cases >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#design-decision-faq >> >> Feedback welcome!
Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 13:25:11 UTC