On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:42:03 +0100, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote: > Well, what I meant was that I don't know what down to earth means in > this context, namely for writing a spec. Down to earth applied to a > policy language specification is absurd. We need a language that is > unambigous and clear to get to interoperable implementations. Agreed. Your comments on where the current specification does not meet that goal are much appreciated. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:45:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:45:24 GMT