- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:54:27 +0100
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, art.barstow@nokia.com
- Cc: "Bertrand Le Roy" <Bertrand.Le.Roy@microsoft.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:43:51 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > Art, correct me if I'm wrong -- but I believe the conclusion of that > discussion was *not* that OPTIONS is deemed rejected, but rather, > that the group is seeking input from the HTTP community on what > design to use? > > http://www.w3.org/2007/11/05-waf-minutes#item09 AFAICT OPTIONS is rejected until there's evidence that it can be used. Requesting feedback from the HTTP WG on this has been done, though so far the HTTP WG has not replied in any official manner. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 23:51:56 UTC