On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:08:32 +0100, Bertrand Le Roy <Bertrand.Le.Roy@microsoft.com> wrote: > I understand that but it brings the question of how you distinguish a > plain GET request to the resource and one that's being made just for > authorization purposes? Is it using "method-check" and is that header > only present in that case? Yes, that is correct. > Is there a precedent of not sending the actual contents of a resource > (but rather meta-data about it) based on the presence of a header? I don't know. > One other design that has been suggested in the OpenAjax discussion by > Manos Batsis from Abiss was to send the request using HEAD and revert to > GET only if the HEAD failed. I already explained why I thought this would be a bad idea in this e-mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0035.html -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 22:56:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:24 GMT