W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > February 2008

comments on Widgets' spec

From: Venezia Claudio <claudio.venezia@telecomitalia.it>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:29:17 +0100
Message-ID: <F5F8BEB3F2C54240999C08F4D455D28802712D4C@PTPEVS108BA020.idc.cww.telecomitalia.it>
To: <public-appformats@w3.org>
Hi All,

A few <comments> on the "spec":

Spec section 7.4 - Cross-widget messaging

 

"AT RISK/Low Priority: This section will define how widgets will be able
to communicate with each other by sending messages via javascript. We
are going to base this model on the Cross-document messaging model found
in HTML 5. Widgets should be able to announce and unannounce themselves
to other widgets."

 

<We understand the Cross widget messaging issue as the matter of
enabling a web application running in a browser window to communicate
with another running in a different one. In the HTML 5 spec the the
cross document messaging processing model if DOC A needs to post a
message to DOC B, DOC A must have inside the object element containing
DOC B. In the cross messaging between Widgets created by different
providers this assumption seems to be unfeasible without introducing a
broker/middleware layer.>

 

"Widgets ought to be able to have some control as to which other widgets
they expose themselves to (in some unique/per instance base). For
instance, by association via digital signature"

<In our understanding the need of keeping control of which other widgets
they expose themselves to is again the proof that a minimal
broker/middleware should be specified.>

 

"Look at the OpenAjax hub model."[Open Ajax hub model for Cross-window,
same-domain communications: provider sends messages from one frame to
another within the same computer system, where the frames might be in
different windows but have to use the same domain.]

<The Open Ajax HUB would indeed address those broker/middleware
functionalities thus addressing the problem of posting messages between
Widgets but should be endowed by some additional registry capability.>


 

Req. 37 We would be in favor of the local storage option

 

Best Regards

 

Claudio

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by replying to webmaster@telecomitalia.it.

        Thank you

                                        www.telecomitalia.it

--------------------------------------------------------------------
                        
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 13:32:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 February 2008 13:32:35 GMT