On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:10:15 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > I'd rather we didn't require the slash. Otherwise, using this header > wouldn't work with URLs of simple CGI scripts. For example: > > http://example.com/demo.cgi > > This can support both being used as a GET or POST target, as well as > being used with a path: > > http://example.com/demo.cgi/user/54 > > It would be sad to require people to say: > > http://example.com/demo.cgi/ > > ...in such cases. For now the slash is not required but is used for comparison purposes. I suggest we leave it this way unless someone comes up with a viable scenario on what could go wrong given that there are use cases for the current solution as Ian indicated above. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Sunday, 10 February 2008 12:09:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 10 February 2008 12:09:53 GMT