On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:44:15 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> It seems like the current spec uses "/foo/" just to be able to do >> substring matches. This seems like the wrong reason to make this >> decision. > > Unless I'm misunderstanding the spec, that's not the case. It certainly > wasn't the case in my proposal... The specification only "appends" "/" (if not present) for comparison purposes. Not for doing the actual request. This is to ensure that /foo.txt can't set the policy for /foo.txt.bar/x It could set the policy for /foo.txt/... though, an unlikely server setup, although it may be an argument for doing the request to the "/" appended version always. Either way works for me. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Saturday, 9 February 2008 11:42:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 9 February 2008 11:42:45 GMT