- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 01:27:03 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:14:28 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: >> If that's not acceptable, I'd like to understand what the motivation >> for the current design is. > > Keeping it in line with the spirit of the Web. So that if you decide to > move an API elsewhere users of the old API won't get a bunch of 404 > errors. See also: > > http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI If I do a POST using AC to a http://example.com/form.cgi and the initial OPTIONS request forwards to http://example.org/pub/form.cgi, does that mean that the POST goes directly to the second URI? That seems like a bad idea to me since it makes cross-site requests behave very different from same-site requests, rather than just differing in authorization. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 4 February 2008 09:27:39 UTC