W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > April 2008

Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:50:43 +1000
Message-ID: <b21a10670804020350m601cdd3bodd23382117d12117@mail.gmail.com>
To: olli.immonen@nokia.com, hlockhar@bea.com, public-appformats@w3.org, member-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org


>
>  So, stating conformance to [X509v3] does not imply that that only v3
>  would be allowed.

That was my exactly my intention when referencing [X509v3] in the spec.

Should the spec recommend one particular version of X509 certs?

Kind regards,
Marcos

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 10:51:16 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Hal Lockhart: "RE: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3"
Previous message: Marcos Caceres: "Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3"
In reply to: olli.immonen@nokia.com: "RE: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3"
Next in thread: Hal Lockhart: "RE: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 April 2008 10:51:16 GMT