Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3

On 2008-04-02 10:32:39 +0300, olli.immonen@nokia.com wrote:

> RFC3280 (a profile of X.509) states a bit more exactly which version
> numbers to use:

...

> So, stating conformance to [X509v3] does not imply that that only v3
> would be allowed. 

Thanks for clarifying this.

A related question: Is there any reason to ask for conformance to
X509v3 directly, as opposed to asking for conformance with RFC 3280?

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>