W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > October 2007

access-control

From: Ric Johnson <ricjohnsoniii@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:05:50 -0400
Message-ID: <cecfffbf0710021705l208dc01ao92c2e8d66d8ef799@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-appformats@w3.org

I have a few questions for the new draft:

Is this really required? I can achieve the same with
   a) Dynamic script tags (JSON requests) as long I am am comfortable with GET
   b) PROXY governance
   c) CNAMEs as a way to bypass the domain restrictions

Other issues:
  a) No only does the browser have to allow this, but XMLRequest does as well.
  b) What about <a href="http://json.Com">JSON</a> responses?  XML is
great, but let us not fall into the "Not invented here" trap

I am NOT saying that this is not a good idea.  It is just that if I
have access to the web server to add a header, then I probably will be
able to solve this problem today.

I actually need this for my JSON requests.  As it stands now, I can do
cross-domain without really looking at security.  Might there be a way
to emulate this using script now?
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:40:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:22 GMT