W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Design issues for access-control

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:54:53 -0500
To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t1bqdrmd64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:42:31 -0500, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> On 2007-10-31 17:11:42 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> The scenario was doing cross-site XML POST as that might hurt
>> SOAP servers.  I seem to recall someone saying this is possible
>> with <form> POST as well though I'm not sure exactly how, but
>> only with XMLHttpRequest the Content-Type header would be an XML
>> MIME type.
>
> Well, Xforms is built around the notion of submitting data in XML to
> arbitrary destination URIs, and that spec enables automatic
> submission (through POST) even without use of Javascript.

You'd only be vulnerable if you'd have a) XForms support and b) it does  
that. Seems rather theoretical and more a problem of XForms.


>>>> Servers will have to deal with cross-site <form> POST, but
>>>> probably don't deal with cross-site XMLHttpRequest POST. As such,
>>>> XMLHttpRequest POST is not guaranteed to be as "safe" as
>>>> cross-site <form> POST is.
>
>>> Please explain the differences from the perspective of the site that
>>> needs to handle these requests, and explain how they are relevant
>>> for the discussion at hand.
>
>> <form> POST is not relevant to the discussion at hand. XMLHttpRequest  
>> POST follows the model with Method-Check, etc.
>
> You're not answering my question.

I don't understand it then, I suppose.


>>> Requiring special server-side processing for an existing method
>>> means a significant change in terms of deployment scenario.
>>
>> Well, you'd have a single resource on the server I assume that
>> takes care of both the GET and POST responses. My point was that
>> if the author of the server is going to handle POST he/she
>> already needs to do a certain amount of coding rather than just
>> putting a data source online. Handling the additional request
>> isn't that more complicated than.
>
> There is a difference between deploying a web application and
> deploying a different HTTP stack.

Well yes, some changes have to be made in order to support this. This is  
not that complicated though with typical server-side languages.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 14:55:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:08 UTC