W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Cloning XBL bound elements

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:14:03 +1000
To: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20070510001403.GC14784@arc.mcc.id.au>

Jonas Sicking:
> Like I said in my original posting, that won't work with state that you 
> need to keep private. Basically here is what would fail:
> …

Sorry, I glossed over your original mail and didn’t see you mentioned
the UserDataHandler (and why it wouldn’t work).

> So in order to set the private data in the clones binding the binding 
> has to expose some API that lets to set the private data directly. 
> However this would mean that the data is no longer private and anyone 
> could at any time change it.

Right.  So after reading your mail properly, I agree that D would be
most useful: have in effect a default copy constructor which can be
overridden (by having a function on the implementation object) in case a
shallow copy of the properties of the private object isn’t sufficient.

Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
	xmpp:heycam@jabber.org  ▪  ICQ 26955922  ▪  MSN cam@mcc.id.au
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2007 00:14:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:07 UTC