Jonas Sicking: > Yes, that is probably how I would interpret the spec now, although it's > not very explicit. This is Option A in my original email. However just > leaving it at that I think would be a severe limitation on what you > could implement using XBL2 since you couldn't keep any private state > while still working with .clone(). You might be able to do it with a UserDataHandler that responds to NODE_CLONED (assuming you have DOM 3 Core). -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.auReceived on Wednesday, 9 May 2007 23:41:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:22 GMT