Re: No path in access item, etc.

Could it be, 'requesting URI', please?
Tim

On 2007-06 -13, at 07:18, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Mon, 21 May 2007 16:53:46 +0200, Anne van Kesteren  
> <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
>>> 1. The term "request URI" is a confusing term for the URI of the  
>>> source making the request, when the HTTP request has a URI in it  
>>> which is the requested URI. It isn't the URI of the requesting  
>>> client, either.    Suggest: codebase URI?  This is like 'codebase  
>>> principals' in existing security models.
>>
>> I'll look into this when updating the document.
>
> I made it "requesting URL" as suggested by Jonas.
>
>
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>