Re: [access-control] update from the editor

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:01:31 +0200, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> On 2007-06-13 11:19:53 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> You could use
>>
>>   <?access-control allow="*" exclude="*"?>
>
> That's actually the equivalent of a no-op, unless semantics have
> changed dramatically.

Not sure what you mean with no-op. It would always deny access as long as  
the access control policy applies.


>> However, I added <?access-control deny=...?> for now.
>
> I continue to be opposed to this, for all the reasons stated
> earlier.

Do you have a proposed alternative solution? And maybe a pointer to your  
earlier stated reasons?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>