On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:50:05 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:29:42 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> wrote: >>>> OK, forget the ? notation. Your examples are very clear and we seem >>>> in full alignment that <foo.com> includes sub domains but <*.foo.com> >>>> wouldn't include foo.com itself. >>> >>> Sounds great. What do other people think of switching to this syntax? >> >> The only slightly confusing thing is that <http://foo.com> also >> matches <http://bar.foo.com> but I suppose that's ok. > > Yeah, I agree, but given all other alternatives I think this is better. Integrated. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:34:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:22 GMT