W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > July 2007

Re: long HTTP header field name in WD-access-control

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:22:09 +0200
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, public-appformats@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tv94q7gg64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:39:04 +0200, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>  
wrote:
> My .02; I'm not too worried about saving bytes (at least on this scale),  
> but I do wonder if that "Content" prefix is justified...

Hmm, I can find me suggesting the name Content-Access-Control as far back  
as 200605 but I'm pretty sure someone else suggested it to me first. I'm  
thinking it was Mark Baker, but I can't find the relevant minutes/e-mail.

(Personally I'd be fine with naming it Access-Control.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 13:22:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:07 UTC