- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:11:26 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org, "Public POWDER" <public-powderwg@w3.org>
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:29:42 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> OK, forget the ? notation. Your examples are very clear and we seem in >> full alignment that <foo.com> includes sub domains but <*.foo.com> >> wouldn't include foo.com itself. > > Sounds great. What do other people think of switching to this syntax? > The difference from the current spec would be to change The only slightly confusing thing is that <http://foo.com> also matches <http://bar.foo.com> but I suppose that's ok. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:12:01 UTC