- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:26:10 +0100
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On 1/22/07, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Innovimax SARL wrote: > > > > In http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xbl-20070117/ > > > > ==Normative Reference== > > Third edition of XML instead of fourth > > First edition of XMLNS instead of second > > Fixed. > > > > ==Inconsistencies== > > evtGroup, but eventPhase > > That's not XBL's fault, that's just how DOM Events has it. > > > > initialize, initialized but initialisation > > Fixed. > > > > focussed and focused are both used > > Fixed. > > > > In 4.9.1. General Rules > > html:label, html:img and html:map but img, map and title (I understand > > non namespaced element in the document are in the XBL namespace) > > Fixed where potentially ambigious. > > > > ==Strange point== > > In 1.4.3. Attributes Containing Space-Separated Values > > It's unclear to me wether you are speaking about before XML character > > normalisation or after. In either case, it seems flawed > > If it is before, to be consistent with XML behaviour, you missed the > > TAB (0x9) char in the space definition > > If it is after, all the 0xA, 0xD no more exist and have been replaced > > by 0x20 (see 3.3.3 Attribute-Value Normalization in XML) > > It is after, because XBL is layered on top of the DOM, which itself is on > top of XML, and therefore the XML rules have already been applied by the > time XBL has anything to do with the content. However, it is still > possible to have U+000A and U+000D characters in attributes, both by using > entities in XML, and by directly putting such character data in the > attribute using the DOM. Ok I see, but then what is the special meaning of 0x9 to not be treated as space ? > > > > ==Schematas== > > It seems, the grammar of a valid xbl document is difficult to explain > > in DTD or XML Schema. > > Is it planned to provide a Relax NG+Schematron or even an NVDL for it ? > > There is no plan to make an official schema for XBL. > > > > ==Typo== > > s/favourite/favorite/ > > s/Feburary/February/ > > s/instace/instance/ > > s/programatically/programmatically/ > > s/recognise/recognize/ > > s/UA's/UAs/ (to be consistent with the majority) > > I couldn't find all of these, and some of them were not incorrect (in > particular the one occurance of "UA's" is currect as it is the singular), > but I have fixed those that I found. Sorry for UA's and Feburary was in XML normative reference Is there any other you didn't found ? > > > > Mohamed > > Thanks for your feedback. Could you let me know your full name for the > acknowledgements section? Mohamed ZERGAOUI Innovimax AC Rep > > Thanks, > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 22 January 2007 10:26:15 UTC