On 1/12/07, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Mark Baker wrote: > >I agree that the change in terminology is a concern though. I suppose > >the proper thing to do would be for the WG to ask the TAG for > >clarification. > > Note http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Sep/0059.html to > which no one responded. I would take this as silent agreement and move > on. I can't find where it says that silence implies agreement in their charter. Would a friendly "ping" be so burdensome? Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.comReceived on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:34:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT