Ian Hickson: > Oh, I see what you're saying. > > That's covered by DOM3 Core, which says "When an EntityReference node > represents a reference to an unknown entity, the node has no children and > its replacement value, when used by Attr.value for example, is empty". > > See: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html#ID-11C98490 Ok. But does that not contradict with the statement If user agents do include entity reference nodes in the DOM, then user agents must handle them as if they were fully expanded when implementing this specification. because if they were fully expanded, then it could have some text, and the xbl:attr="def=xbl:text" would behave differently? -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.auReceived on Saturday, 13 January 2007 05:59:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT