Re: [XBL] Explicit Inheritance

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>
> 3.7.1 Explicit Inheritance
> 
> I cannot understand the steps in this section for binding 
> de/reattachment when a binding’s extends attribute is modified.  It 
> would benefit with an example.

I really don't want to add an example, lest it encourage people to 
dynamically change their extends="" attribute.

However, I've rewritten the relevant section, so hopefully the new text is 
clearer. Let me know if the new text is ok.


>   If, given the same definitions, the element was bound directly to C,
>   then the chain would be C-B.
> 
> s/C-B/C→B/

Fixed.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'