- From: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:27:09 +1000
- To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: <public-appformats@w3.org>
After reading the spec further this section is now clear to me. No further action needed:) Marcos -----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] Sent: Friday, 5 January 2007 3:13 PM To: Marcos Caceres Cc: public-appformats@w3.org Subject: Re: [XBL] clarification: explicit children must be redistributed? On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > Can you please add a little more detail to clarify how point 6 in > Section 3.5 works. It currently reads: > > If the new binding changes which shadow trees contribute to the final > flattened tree then the explicit children must be redistributed. > > I've read section "processing content elements", but I am still a bit > unclear about how this step works. I don't really understand what isn't clear... Could you describe to me what your interpretation of that sentence is, so that I can work out what it is that needs changing/improving? Thanks, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 02:27:26 UTC