From a precision standpoint, however, I think "except" is a more clear term than deny as "except" implies a conditional on the previous statement where "deny" does not. allow=foo without=bar ??? exclude? --Brad Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:49:22 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: >>> I'm thinking of changing "except" back to "deny". "except" >>> together with "accept" is just too confusing when talking about >>> it. >> >> I agree about the confusion. I wonder what people would think of >> "allow" and "except." > > Heh, oops. The draft already has that. I still think it's a bad idea > to use "except" though for the same reason. I agree with Hixie (over > on #webapi) that using a homophone for the attribute name is not a > good idea here. > > > --Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > >Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 22:11:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT