W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [AC] except -> deny

From: Brad Porter <brad@tellme.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:10:52 -0800
Message-ID: <45DE14EC.5010303@tellme.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>

 From a precision standpoint, however, I think "except" is a more clear 
term than deny as "except" implies a conditional on the previous 
statement where "deny" does not. 

allow=foo without=bar ???

exclude?

--Brad

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:49:22 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
>>> I'm thinking of changing "except" back to "deny". "except"
>>> together with "accept" is just too confusing when talking about
>>> it.
>>
>> I agree about the confusion.  I wonder what people would think of
>> "allow" and "except."
>
> Heh, oops. The draft already has that. I still think it's a bad idea 
> to use "except" though for the same reason. I agree with Hixie (over 
> on #webapi) that using a homophone for the attribute name is not a 
> good idea here.
>
>
> --Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 22:11:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT