Re: [ac] Updates to Access-Control document

There's already a HTTP header registry, and it doesn't require any  
particular format for the syntax specification;
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3864.txt

Cheers,


On 2007/02/17, at 5:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:40:36 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo- 
> inc.com> wrote:
>> There's informal, unofficial activity (disclaimer: I'm one of the  
>> instigators) on the HTTP WG list to revise RFC2616, but the stated  
>> intent is to get a WG and make it formal. See:
>>    <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/>
>
> And that will also define a registration mechanism for HTTP headers  
> which requires the use of ABNF as opposed to EBNF?
>
> Anyway, I'll have a look once the rest is settled...
>
>
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot@yahoo-inc.com