Re: Widget Requirements

Art,
You are right about R11, I'll update it later today.
Marcos

On 2/2/07, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Jim, Marcos,
>
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 8:52 AM, ext Jim Ley wrote:
> >
> > A couple of notes - I think you brush rather lightly over requirements
> > related to security APIs e.g. R19 and R11 are only SHOULD and MAY, I'd
> > like to see widgets fully address this issue of how a widget can
> > negotiate with a user (through preferences or whatever) access to
> > different API's.  So I'd like to see a MUST here (of course this is a
> > very difficult requirement, but ...)
>
> Regarding R11, as currently written I think this requirement is
> confusing. The intent seems to be something like:
>
> [[
> An instance of the packaging format must contain a Manifest Resource
> [insert link to section 3.2]". The requirements of that resource are
> defined in section 3.2.
> ]]
>
> Thus I would re-word R11 to something like the above and delete the
> list since most if not all of them have their own requirement in
> section 3.2.
>
> Regarding R19, Jim - would you please expand on what you mean by "how
> a widget can negotiate with a user"?
>
> I certainly agree Access-Control and Security are important issues.
> However, as you imply the details here are likely non-trivial.
>
> Regards,
>
> Art
> ---
>
>


-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au