On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:20:29 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Actually, I'm not sure we should recommend this. I wouldn't be surprised > if the Referer-Root header will end up being used for other specs too in > the future. Especially given it's very generic name. > > If we really want servers to do this, maybe we should name the header > AC-Referer-root instead? > > The server could also simply not put any access-control headers or PIs > in any responses, that would have the same effect. Agreed. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 23:04:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:24 GMT