W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > August 2007

Re: widget namespace

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:47:52 +0200
Message-Id: <EB0ACEAA-E7C7-4189-AD91-39F7A673CF4C@berjon.com>
Cc: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>

Hi Marcos,

On Aug 28, 2007, at 14:01, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> A well designed format is one for which people can make uses and
>> extensions unforeseen by the creator. Putting a namespace here is
>> zero-cost, not putting it is just begging to look stupid down the  
>> line.
> Appealing to our ego's is a nice rhetorical trick, but it's better to
> keep the arguments on a technical level:-)

Actually "looking stupid down the line" wasn't an appeal to ego, it's  
just a way of giving a little perspective over time. My experience  
with specs is that altogether too often they had a chance of using an  
extension mechanism early, and those that didn't tend to look back  
and go "whoops"  that's technical, or at least motivated in reality.  
I do have rhetorical tricks, but they're usually less subtle ;-)

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
E-prime is cool!
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 10:48:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:07 UTC