Re: long HTTP header field name in WD-access-control

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:47:18 +0200, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:
>> (Personally I'd be fine with naming it Access-Control.)
>
> I don't think I would have suggested that name.  The Content-* headers
> are defined to be entity headers, whereas Access-Control would
> presumably be a response header.

Well, that settles it then. Seems the HTTP gods agree on this one :-)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 13:50:33 UTC