Hi, According to XBL 2.0 working draft > Although they have had related histories, this specification is separate from the W3C's "sXBL" drafts, and is not compatible with them. (The two efforts use different namespaces, for one.) - http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/ IMHO, sXBL seems not to be compatible with XBL 2.0. sXBL seems inactive, but Batik, a SVG implementation, supports a subset of sXBL in subversion. If nothing is done, the compatibility will break. I think Appformats and SVG working groups should push XBL 2.0 cooperatively. -- KUROSAWA Takeshi (taken) mail : <taken.spc@gmail.com> www : <http://taken.s101.xrea.com/>Received on Sunday, 10 September 2006 10:38:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT