W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > September 2006

Re: A question on sXBL and XBL 2.0

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:19:35 +0200
To: herve.girod@club-internet.f
Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tfnlexbk64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:51:00 +0200, Hervé Girod  
<herve.girod@club-internet.fr> wrote:
> I just saw on W3C Web site that Web appformats WG has released a Last  
> Call Working Draft for XBL 2.0, and I have some questions about the WG  
> strategy about XBL 2.0 / sXBL relationship.
>
> - will the sXBL working draft be dropped in favor of the more general  
> XBL 2.0 (there is a specific chapter on XBL 2.0 with SVG, and it seems,  
> by looking at the table of contents, that the xSBL TOC is a subset of  
> XBL 2. TOC too) ?

That's my understanding. I'm not sure if there are any plans to update  
sXBL to point that out though. I suppose that would be a good thing to do  
once XBL 2.0 reaches either Candidate Recommendation or Recommendation  
status.


> - is sXBL a subset of XBL 2.0, or is there some (volontary) subtle  
> differences between the two recomandations ?

http://annevankesteren.nl/2005/11/xbl lists the differences, but it hasn't  
been updated to take later changes into account. Then again, I think there  
aren't that many (later changes).


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 10 September 2006 08:19:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT