On Sep 8, 2006, at 04:58, Mark Baker wrote: > So, what might the good reasons be not to define an XBL2 media type? XBL2 can work without a media type of its own. Hence, it will be served as application/xml anyway. Therefore, anyone who wishes to see if something is XBL2 needs to look inside application/xml documents anyway. And new media types are not free of cost to everyone who has to think about them, configure them and code for them. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 06:52:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT