Re: XBL media type?

On Sep 8, 2006, at 04:58, Mark Baker wrote:

> So, what might the good reasons be not to define an XBL2 media type?

XBL2 can work without a media type of its own. Hence, it will be  
served as application/xml anyway. Therefore, anyone who wishes to see  
if something is XBL2 needs to look inside application/xml documents  
anyway. And new media types are not free of cost to everyone who has  
to think about them, configure them and code for them.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 06:52:10 UTC