Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 id and xml:id

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:25:27 +0200, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote:
> * unexpected attributes are defined by the specification
>    if not, that will have to be defined, back to the comment on expected  
> context.

It seems pretty clear to me, as an implementor. Either the attribute is  
supported (expected) or not (unexpected). If we support xml:id we can  
expect it on every element and therefore it wouldn't be unexpected and it  
would just work fine.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 07:45:23 UTC