- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:06:57 +0900
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-appformats@w3.org
Le 26 oct. 2006 à 20:31, Dean Jackson a écrit :
>> yes. Cf another comment about "CSS Selectors", where in your
>> reply, it is stated that Selectors is a transversal technology not
>> related to CSS 3.
>> That will have to be addressed at a higher level.
>>
>> The rest of this issue is on hold once there will be more
>> clarifications on the outcome of WGs working on similar things.
>> Diversity is good if there is a common model which guarantee
>> interoperability. It is then unrelated to this thread.
>>
>> Thanks Ian for taking the time to answer
>
> Karl, does this mean you're no longer objecting? (Ian asks this
> question below).
>
> Dean
From
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/disposition-of-comments?
rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
Comment 14.
Summary: Request to allow any implementation mechanism for parsing.
Status: Reviewer said the issue was on hold. Unclear how to proceed.
Thread:
http://www.w3.org/mid/20061005054521.7E8134F312@homer.w3.org
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/
0039.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/
0077.html
CLOSED BY REVIEWER
and from
http://www.w3.org/2006/10/26-waf-minutes.html#item02
It seems that Ian closed already the issue before the WG.
Thanks.
Satisfied.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 02:07:37 UTC