Le 26 oct. 2006 à 20:31, Dean Jackson a écrit : >> yes. Cf another comment about "CSS Selectors", where in your >> reply, it is stated that Selectors is a transversal technology not >> related to CSS 3. >> That will have to be addressed at a higher level. >> >> The rest of this issue is on hold once there will be more >> clarifications on the outcome of WGs working on similar things. >> Diversity is good if there is a common model which guarantee >> interoperability. It is then unrelated to this thread. >> >> Thanks Ian for taking the time to answer > > Karl, does this mean you're no longer objecting? (Ian asks this > question below). > > Dean From http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/disposition-of-comments? rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain Comment 14. Summary: Request to allow any implementation mechanism for parsing. Status: Reviewer said the issue was on hold. Unclear how to proceed. Thread: http://www.w3.org/mid/20061005054521.7E8134F312@homer.w3.org http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/ 0039.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/ 0077.html CLOSED BY REVIEWER and from http://www.w3.org/2006/10/26-waf-minutes.html#item02 It seems that Ian closed already the issue before the WG. Thanks. Satisfied. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 02:07:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT