Re: [XBL] CSS namespace and XBL 2.0

Le 06-10-12 à 07:24, Ian Hickson a écrit :
>>>> It seems that url() is at risk from their specification.
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/#syntax
>>>
>>> Yeah, that's an error in the CSS3 Namespaces draft.
>>
>> What is an error?
>> 	- url() will be dropped
>> 	- string will be dropped
>> 	- both will be authorized?
>
> The error is that the namespaces draft deprecates features that it
> introduces. Both url() and string are to be allowed. (They have to  
> be, for
> compatibility with existing content.)

Open until  the dependency is fixed then.



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 05:43:55 UTC