Le 06-10-12 à 07:24, Ian Hickson a écrit : >>>> It seems that url() is at risk from their specification. >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/#syntax >>> >>> Yeah, that's an error in the CSS3 Namespaces draft. >> >> What is an error? >> - url() will be dropped >> - string will be dropped >> - both will be authorized? > > The error is that the namespaces draft deprecates features that it > introduces. Both url() and string are to be allowed. (They have to > be, for > compatibility with existing content.) Open until the dependency is fixed then. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 05:43:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT