W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > October 2006

Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 Conformance requirements and Authoring Tools

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:30:18 +0000 (UTC)
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0610062228590.19875@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Karl Dubost wrote:
> > > 
> > > Has the WG forgotten to address authoring tools or was it 
> > > intentional to not talk about them?
> > 
> > No, I didn't forget about authoring tools. There just wasn't anything 
> > to say about them. However, in response to one of your other comments 
> > I've now explicitly mentioned them in the conformance section. Let me 
> > know if that's ok.
> 
> Where do you explicitly mention them? or maybe not committed in CVS yet. 
> Let me know when you have done it.

1.2 Conformance, paragraph 5:

# Products that generate XBL subtrees cannot claim conformance to this 
# specification, though they can claim to only produce XBL subtrees that 
# themselves are conformant to this specification.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 22:30:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:05 UTC