- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:11:41 +0900
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Le 6 oct. 06 à 07:51, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote:
>>
>> It is better to not start the [abstract] by "This specification"
>
> Fixed.
Thanks.
>> Reading the abstract, It is not clear what XBL 2.0 is about. Mozilla
>> developer site does a better job.
>
> I'm not convinced the Mozilla developer site does a better job, but
> I have
> attempted to improve the abstract to combine the better parts of both.
> Please let me know if the new abstract is not satisfactory:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/Overview.html?
> content-type=text/html
Thanks. The first sentence is better, indeed. associate is also
easier to understan than map.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 01:11:52 UTC