Hi, The current draft defines that rel="alternate" should be used for autodiscovery of widgets [1]. I think that is a mistake because a widget isn't necessarily an alternate representation of the document. In fact, in most cases, it won't be. Consider a site like Apple's Dashboard widget download page [2], which lists many widgets for download, none of which are alternatives of that page. I propose that a new "widget" value be defined for that purpose instead. <link rel="widget" type="application/widget" href="/example.widget" title="An Example Widget"> I also think the value should be allowed on <a> elements as well, and autodiscovery should work for such links. Since authors are usually going to include a link to the widget somewhere in the page, it's redundant to require that each one also be specified <a href="/example.widget" rel="widget">An Example Widget</a> The value also makes the use of the type attribute optional, since UAs can just recognise the widget value. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-widgets-20061109/#autodiscovery [2] http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/ -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/Received on Friday, 24 November 2006 08:03:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT