- From: Andrew Lenart <posterandrewlenart@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:18:58 -0800 (PST)
- To: public-appformats@w3.org
Dear Anne and Marcos, I suggest that section 2.5 (File Extension) should say that, in an environment where a file extension rather than a content-type is used to indicate the media type, the recommended file extension is '.widget'. In section 3: A DTD is probably appropriate. How about a link to info about the widget, not just the author? Why shouldn't the icon be in JPEG format, or image/invented-next-year format, for that matter? My guess is that you'll end up allowing an external link for the icon (w3.org/TR/webarch, section 4.4), although you might recommend an internal link. Your 'id' element is (intended to be) much more unique than just within the XML document; since the attribute name 'id' is frequently used for the latter, I suggest a different name. Also, won't there be cases where the initial dimensions of the widget should be determined by the environment, rather than by the widget itself? Yours sincerely, Andrew Lenart ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Compare mortgage rates for today. Get up to 5 free quotes. www2.nextag.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2006 15:10:12 UTC