- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:19:19 -0800
- To: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:06:40 -0800, Ed Voas <voas@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Hmm, yeah that's true. I had considered metadata.xml. Of course, we > could go Apple-like and name it Info.xml. FWIW, I think it's better if we spend time on discussing what actually should be in this file and if things like initial widget size and such would not belong in the file where they would be put instead and how. After that, it's probably easier to come up with a suitable name. I think the current name quite accurately describes what it contains and is intended for. Obviously, if some people have the feeling certain features have to be moved somewhere else there might be need for a new name. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 07:19:47 UTC