Steve K Speicher a écrit : > In reference to [1] specifically @extends: It seems somewhat clear that > multiple URIs and therefore multiple inheritance is disallowed. It only > states "the URI of a binding", could be helpful to clearly state that only > 1 URI is allowed. > > But by reading [2] it seems like multiple inheritance can sort of be > achieved by using implicit bindings as described in "4.7 Binding > Inheritance". Any reason not to support multiple inheritance explicitly > by allowing multiple base URIs to extend (or some such appropriate > mechanism in <binding>)? > From what I understood, the inheritance is not polymorphism. "Multiple inheritance" in the document describes the fact the inherited binding also inherits from another one. Regards, Cyril > Regards, > Steve Speicher > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#the-binding > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#binding1 > >Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 14:26:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT