W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > December 2006

[XBL] Inheritance chain clarification

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:12:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4576EBD5.7000708@enst.fr>
To: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>

Dear XBL experts,

This email comments on the 7 September 2006 LCWD of XBL 2.0.
In Section 4.7 "Binding inheritance", is this correct to say that a 
"base binding of the chain" is a "base binding" if the chain of binding 
is the first one attached to the element.
In other words, in the example, there is no base binding, because the 
base binding of the chains are 'c', 'c', 'd' and 'g' but 'g' implicitely 
inherits from 'd', 'd' from 'c' and 'c' from 'a'.
In this example, 'e' is the most derived binding, correct ?
Please explain the terms also using the example.

Cyril Concolato
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 13:59:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT