T.V Raman wrote: > Personally, I believe that the decision to mandate that xml > content types be served as application/xml+xhtml was the key > mistake that happened circa 2000 XML MIME types are */*+xml. i.e. "application/xhtml+xml" > Sadly, this happened right around the time the decision to place > newer XML-based content-types under mime-type application/xml+* > happened [...] Your brief history failed to explain *why* XML MIME types are a bad idea. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 23:50:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT