Krzysztof Maczynski wrote: > In my opinion, the name „javascript:” is misleading. How is it misleading? > Could it be changed to „ecmascript:” or at least the two declared > equivalent? That wouldn't be backwards compatible with anything and would have no benefit. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 23:17:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT