W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > August 2006

Re: XBL in CSS

From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:12:41 -0700
Message-ID: <17637.1529.190543.424808@retriever.corp.google.com>
To: ian@hixie.ch
Cc: raman@google.com, bert@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, public-appformats@w3.org

It doesn't quite allay the concern -- it might be "language
version independent" as seen today --- but it'll effectively
dictate how future versions of CSS evolve -- in the name of
"backward compatibility".

I would express an equivalent concern over the way CSS selectors
are presently tied into XBL -- it's also not clear in that
instance which version of CSS is being  "bound" to.

Ian Hickson writes:
 > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, T.V Raman wrote:
 > >
 > > Tying together given versions of CSS and XBL at specific design points 
 > > is likely to turn into a maintainance problem long-term.
 > The property is actually language-version independent; in fact other 
 > people on this thread have even suggested that the proposed features could 
 > be used with other binding languages in due course. I agree it would be a 
 > bad idea to tie specific versions together like this; hopefully this 
 > clarification alleviates the concern.
 > -- 
 > Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
 > http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
 > Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Best Regards,

Title:  Research Scientist      
Email:  raman@google.com
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
GTalk:  raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman 
Received on Friday, 18 August 2006 00:13:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:05 UTC