W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > August 2006

Re: XBL2 and xml:id

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:38:07 +0200
Message-Id: <E75B8045-7E48-4260-9F5D-9C153735A614@expway.fr>
Cc: Dave Hodder <dmh@dmh.org.uk>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w3future.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Antoine Quint <aq@fuchsia-design.com>, Luca Mascaro <info@lucamascaro.info>, Scott Hayman <shayman@rim.com>, Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>, public-appformats@w3.org
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

On Aug 03, 2006, at 23:41, Ian Hickson wrote:
> It has come to my attention that not everybody thought that the xml:id
> discussion was resovled. To recap, the conclusion was that xml:id can
> be used with XBL2 if desired, and that in addition, a simple "id"
> attribute is to be included for consistency with HTML. If this doesn't
> cater for your use case, please don't hesitate to reply to this e-mail
> explaining your use case and how this solution does not satisfy it.

I don't think that this solution exemplifies good, quality design and  
I've already made my objections and use cases clear, but in the  
interest of not wasting my vacation time talking with someone  
incapable of cool-headed discussions using arguments grounded in  
reality rather than theology, or for that matter basic respect for  
others and their opinions, I don't see the point of discussing it  

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2006 15:38:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:05 UTC